|
The Kent
County Planning Commission met in regular session on Thursday, November
6, 2003, in the County Commissioners Hearing Room at 400 High Street,
Chestertown, Maryland, with the following members in attendance:
Elizabeth Morris, Chairman; Bill Sutton; Patricia Langenfelder;
Marcy Brown; Rev. Ruben Freeman; Jay Lancaster; F. Joseph Hickman;
G. Mitchell Mowell, Attorney; Gail Owings, Planning Director; Carla
Martin, Community Planner; Amy Moredock, Environmental Planner;
Elizabeth Carroll, Secretary.
APPLICATIONS
FOR REVIEW
#03-80 Barry C. Buckley - Buffer Variance - Mr. Buckley requests
a variance of 50-foot to construct a 360 square foot addition within
the 100-foot Critical Area Buffer. The 14.6 acre parcel is located
on Lovely Lane and Piney Point in the head waters of Lovely Cove.
The property is zoned "RCD".
Mr. Buckley
was present and sworn in with staff by Chairman Morris.
Ms. Moredock
reviewed the staff report noting applicable law and relevant issues.
Ms. Moredock reviewed the criteria for granting a variance. She
noted this variance would not cause a substantial detriment to neighboring
properties, nor would it change the character of the district. The
Comprehensive Plan encourages the maintenance of buffers. Staff
feels that an addition to the existing dwelling does not constitute
an unwarranted hardship nor does it deny the applicant uses generally
shared by neighboring property owners. Ms. Moredock recommended
denial of this variance request, however if the Planning Commission
chooses to approve the application, then approval should be contingent
on: 1) Mitigation of 3:1 for disturbance within the buffer should
be required consisting of a mix of native trees and shrubs; and
2) Stormwater runoff from proposed structures should be directed
to stable vegetation in the form of rain gardens / bio-retention
areas.
John Wilson,
Coordinator for the Maryland Eastern Shore RC & D Council, Inc.,
forwarded the Planning Office a copy of a letter that was sent to
Mr. Buckley noting their concerns and recommending certain steps
be taken to prevent any impact on the Critical Area Buffer.
Chairman
Morris invited Mr. Buckley to present his comments. Mr. Buckley
submitted a site plan for the Planning Commission to review, pointing
out the unusual configuration of his parcel. Thinking in the future,
Mr. Buckley advised the addition would provide additional space
needed when he retires in Kent County. The proposed addition would
accommodate any limitations he may experience rather than going
into a nursing home. Mr. Buckley feels his variance request is reasonable.
There are other properties in the area which are larger than his
home. He met with Ed Birkmire at the site and was advised that the
Health Department has no objection.
Mr. Buckley
advised the house was built in 1946 as a seasonal structure. Although
a larger addition is proposed, he is willing to amend his application,
reducing the size of the addition. Mr. Buckley feels he does have
a practical difficulty because his parcel is entirely within the
Critical Area Buffer. There are also natural vegetation and trees
to preserve.
There
were no comments from the audience.
After
some discussion, Ms. Brown made a motion to forward an unfavorable
recommendation to the Board of Appeals, recommending the Board deny
the Buckley variance request. After hearing testimony from the applicant
and reviewing the law, the Planning Commission found the following:
- -Mr. Buckley demonstrated
no unwarranted hardship.
- -The variance
will not cause a substantial detriment to adjacent properties
and would not change the character of the neighborhood or district.
- -The comprehensive
plan is mute on this point.
However,
should the Board of Appeals approve the Buckley variance, the Planning
Commission suggests approval contingent on:
- Mitigation of
3:1 for disturbance within the buffer should be required consisting
of a mix of native trees and shrubs; and
- Stormwater runoff
from proposed structures should be directed to stable vegetation
in the form of rain gardens / bio-retention areas in accordance
with the criteria suggested by the Critical Area Commission
and the Maryland Eastern Shore RC & D Council, Inc.
The motion
was seconded. Chairman Morris called for the vote which was unanimous.
#03-103 James R. Guard - Variance - Mr. Guard is requesting
a variance for a pier and six mooring pilings with an overall length
of 170-feet. The property is located on Quaker Neck Landing Road
and the Chester River in the Seventh Election District. The 1.4
acre parcel is zoned "CAR".
Mr. and
Mrs. Guard were present and sworn in with staff by Chairman Morris.
Ms. Moredock
reviewed the staff report noting that the Guards constructed a 170-foot
pier this past summer and were cited with a citation and fined for
failure to obtain county permits. The Guards now have a permit application
on file for a 150-foot pier, but want to increase the pier to 170-foot
provided the Board of Appeals approves their variance request. MDE
approved a permit for 150-foot pier with six mooring piles but with
a condition restricting construction from October 15 through March
31 because of the waterfowl concentration area.
Ms. Moredock
noted applicable law found in Article V, Section 5 of the Land Use
Ordinance. The additional 20 feet of length on the pier and the
pilings effects the neighboring property owners' navigable access
thereby causing a substantial detriment and changing the character
of the neighborhood. An adjustment of lot lines must be completed.
The extended property lines must be established to further determine
if the pier meets setback requirements. The Comprehensive Plan is
neutral on this issue. No unwarranted hardship appears to exist.
Ms. Moredock recommended denial of the variance.
The Critical
Areas Commission, via conversation with staff, advised if the Land
Use Ordinance is upheld and any portion of the pier has to be removed,
it should not occur during the waterfowl staging time.
Correspondence
was received from Peter and Susan Gates expressing their concern
and objection to the pier extension. It is felt the new pier poses
a substantial detriment to their property and will change the character
of the neighborhood. They are concerned about the placement of the
down-river mooring pilings.
Mr. Guard
advised he purchased the property in 1981 and in 1984 added additional
land to his property giving him 170-foot waterfront. He owns an
old 40-foot bay boat which has been kept on a mooring about 120-foot
further from the pier. He obtained approval from MDE for 150-foot
pier but did not know he needed county approval. Mr. Guard reviewed
his site plan with the Planning Commission. He explained
how the 20-foot extension
occurred. He feels he does have a hardship. Discussion continued
regarding the pier length.
After
review and discussion, Ms. Brown made a motion to forward an unfavorable
recommendation to the Board of Appeals recommending denial of Mr.
Guard's 20-foot variance to construct a 170-foot pier with six mooring
pilings. This decision is based on the following findings:
- -There will be
a substantial detriment to neighboring properties and the pier
will change the character of the neighborhood.
- -The variance
is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
- -The practical
difficulty is not caused by any condition of the property.
- -The need for
the variance is caused by the applicant's own actions.
- -There does not
appear to be any unwarranted hardship.
- -The granting
of a variance is not in harmony with the general spirit and
intent of the Critical Area and Kent County regulations.
- -The proposal
may adversely affect water quality, fish, wildlife and plant
habitat.
However,
should the Board of Appeals decide to approve the variance, the
Planning Commission recommends the down river mooring pilings be
removed to achieve the required 100-foot distance between adjoining
pilings. The motion was seconded and the vote unanimous.
#02-156 Robert Glen Morton - Major Subdivision - (Final Plat - one
lot); #03-119 Road Waiver -
Mr. Hickman
advised he knows the adjoining property owner and has some knowledge
of this application, but he does feel it will impact any decision
he may make on this application.
Surveyor
Michael Scott was present and sworn in with staff. Mr. and Mrs.
Morton were in the audience.
Mrs. Owings
advised Mr. Morton is requesting final approval of his two-lot subdivision
on Chesterville- Millington Road, in the First Election District,
creating two 15-acre parcels. The property is zoned "AZD".
The Maryland
Department of the Environment approved a wetlands delineation for
this site. Preliminary approval was granted by the Planning Commission
at the October 2003 meeting. Preliminary approval grandfathered
the subdivision so that the final plat is reviewed under the old
zoning and subdivision regulations. Mrs. Owings noted applicable
law.
A letter
has been received from Judy Tubman, an adjoining property owner,
advising she and another neighbor plan to place their properties
in a Maryland Environmental Trust. She requests the location of
the house be delineated on the plat. A letter was also received
from Engineer Peter Bourne addressing stormwater.
Jim Wright,
County Engineer, informed staff that since this road can only serve
two properties, County Roads does not wish to accept roads of this
length. Mrs. Owings reviewed applicable law for private roads. Staff
recommended approval of the road waiver. The waiver will not cause
a substantial detriment
to neighboring
properties. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the
general intent of the zoning ordinance. The hardship is caused by
the numerous non-tidal wetlands, streams and other natural features
on the site as well as the decision by the County Engineer. A road
maintenance agreement should be recorded with the final plat.
Stormwater
management plans have been approved by Soil Conservation, and zoning
regulations have been met, therefore staff recommends final subdivision
approval.
Mr. Scott
reviewed the plat with the Planning Commission. He noted the locations
of the wet-weather testing sites approved by the Health Department.
The new lots are for Mr. Morton's children. A road waiver is requested.
Chairman
Morris asked for public comments. Mr. Christopher Kent, adjoining
property owner to the south and east of the subject property. He
is concerned about stormwater runoff. He is preserving his 224 acre
farm in the Eastern Shore Land Conservancy and the Maryland Environmental
Trust. Although he doe not support the subdivision, he would not
object if the dwelling locations are delineated on the plat.
After
some discussion between the Planning Commission and Attorney Mowell,
the Board took a 10-minute break to allow Mr. Scott time to talk
to his clients regarding the location of the dwelling sites on the
plat.
Continuing
with the meeting, Mr. Scott advised the Morton have agreed to the
location of the houses and Mr. Scott drew the locations on the plat.
Ms. Brown
made a motion to grant a waiver of the county road requirements
to allow a private road in a major subdivision. This decision is
based on the following findings:
1) This
approval will reduce the number of entrances on Morgnec Road
2) The
County Road Department does not wish to accept roads of this length.
3) This
waiver will not cause a substantial detriment to neighboring properties.
4) It
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the general intent
of the Land Use Ordinance.
5) The
hardship is created by numerous non-tidal wetlands and streams and
other natural features
on the
site.
6) A road
maintenance agreement must be approved by counsel and recorded with
the final plat.
7) The
plat should clearly indicate this is a private road and not the
responsibility of the county.
The motion
was seconded and the vote unanimous.
Ms. Brown
made a motion to grant final approval for the Robert Morton Major
Subdivision approving the creation of two 15-acre parcels. All county
regulations have been met. The plat has been amended to show the
two building envelopes. The road maintenance agreement will need
to be recorded with the final plat. The motion was seconded and
the vote unanimous.
#02-140 Millington Food Lion - Final Site Plan - Millington
Food Lion requests final site plan approval for a one-story 28,657
square foot retail store on approximately six acres of th 228-acre
farm owned by Albert Aaron. The property is located on Route 291
west of Millington. The property is zoned "C" Commercial and "RCD".
Vince
Watkins of the Watkins Group, Dennis Bost, Bonduranti Associates;
Dave Powers, McCrone, Inc.; and Gail Owings were sworn in by Chairman
Morris.
Mrs. Owings
reviewed the staff report noting the history of this proposal. At
the June 5, 2003 meeting the Planning Commission reviewed the site
plan and offered several comments. On September 4, 2003, the Planning
Commission granted preliminary site plan approval with specific
conditions.
Mrs. Owings
noted relevant issues and reviewed applicable law. Mrs. Owings recommended
final site plan approval provided parking, stormwater and sediment
control plans are approved. The Planning Commission must make the
following findings:
- -The application
is generally consistent with the comprehensive plan
- -The application
complies with the standards of the Land Use Ordinance
- -Circulation on-site
appears to be adequate. The traffic study indicates Route 291
is currently at level of service "A" and will remain at that
level after development. All intersections will continue to
operate at acceptable levels of service under post development
traffic conditions. The plan adequately addresses pedestrian,
bicycle and vehicular traffic.
- -Lighting is consistent
with the requirements.
- -Parking and loading
will serve the proposed store.
- -The property
will be served by public water and sewer when those services
become available.
- -Proper sediment
control and stormwater management practices are proposes.
- -Tree removal
has been minimized and the proposed afforestation complies with
the Forest Conservation requirements.
- -The site will
be landscaped and screened from adjacent properties and lighting
should avoid glare onto adjacent properties.
- -The building
has been designed to appear as a group of smaller structures.
Since this will be sitting in a field, it is difficult to design
a structure of this size is integrated into the existing landscape.
Chairman
Morris asked the applicants about the parking agreement and signage.
Attorney Mowell said he received a draft parking agreement which
needs some minor changes.
Mr. Watkins
presented minor changes to the front elevations that Food Lion has
requested. They are requesting the sign changed from white to yellow.
The awnings to be changed from green and yellow to white and yellow,
and rather than fabric awnings they would like to have metal powder
coated awnings. The other change would be to remove the false door
because it might confuse customers. The final change request would
be to remove the columns. Mr. Watkins noted these changes will not
change the outline of the building. Discussion ensued regarding
the proposed changes and other issues of concern.
Mr. Watkins
advised construction will not begin until the county/town water
town is under construction which probably will be late 2004. Approval
is needed now to purchase the land. Mr. Mowell noted if final approval
is granted and construction does not begin by November 2004, it
will be necessary for the applicants to request a one-year extension.
A text
amendment will be required to allow the sign proposed.
There
were no public comments.
Ms. Brown
made a motion to grant final site plan approval for the Millington
Food Lion one-story 28,657 square foot retail store, contingent
on specific conditions:
- -The columns
must be put back on plan
- -The signage
should remain white. A text amendment will be required for
the size proposed.
- -A signed stormwater
management maintenance agreement is recorded with the Kent
County Clerk of Circuit Court.
- -Another native
tree replaces the Green Ash.
- -The parking
and road maintenance agreement after approval by the Planning
Commission Attorney is recorded with the Kent County Clerk
of Circuit Court.
- -Approval of
the sediment control and stormwater management plans.
- -Approval of
the required bonds or letters-of-credit for landscaping, sediment
control, forestation, stormwater management. A bond is also
required with State Highway Administration for the road entrance.
- -Replace all
references to Queen Anne's County with Kent County.
- -The final subdivision
plat is recorded with the Kent County Clerk of Circuit Court.
#03-08 John Stoltzfus/Dutch Family Corporation - Hotel Complex -
Preliminary Site Plan - Mr. Stoltzfus is requesting preliminary
site plan approval for a 40-room hotel, restaurant, and convenience
store on his 7.559 acre parcel on River Road (Route 291) and MD
Route 301. The property is located in the First Election District
and is zoned "CCA" Commercial Critical Area.
John Stoltzfus,
Kevin Shearon and Ms. Moredock were sworn in by Chairman Morris.
Mr. Stoltzfus
has been working on this proposal review since 1993 with the Technical
Advisory Committee reviewing the plan many times. At the April 2003
Planning Commission meeting, the Board made comments and suggestions
after reviewing the concept plan. Ms. Moredock read the list of
comments.
Ms. Moredock
reviewed the staff report noting applicable law and relevant issues.
She read the criteria for site plan review found in the Land Use
Ordinance. Staff recommended approval contingent upon the Planning
Commission's approval of the buildings' compatibility with historic
and cultural design with the county, specifically color, building
materials, rear and side elevations.
No new
correspondence has been received in the office.
Mr. Shearon
reviewed the site plan showing the changes to the plat and addressed
issues expressed by the Planning Commission at the April 2003 meeting.
Parking has been moved. Afforestation is on the south side of the
property with the stormwater management / bio-retention area. Handicap
spaces and have been added and so indicated. The buildings will
be connected with a 10-foot breezeway.
Mr. Shearon
advised public sewer has been extended to the east side of Route
301. Mr. Shearon submitted sewer and water allocation figures to
Wayne Morris, Director of Water and Waste Water, who in turn has
met with the County Commissioners for their approval. Mr. Shearon
said he was told the Commissioners will approve allocation for the
project once the system comes on line.
Mr. Shearon
further noted parking for any tractor trailers will be moved away
from the residential area on the north side closer to the overpass.
More evergreens are proposed to provide a deeper buffer rather than
building a berm. The bio-retention area will be divided by a significant
ditch. Discussion continued.
Staff
noted the project will bring about a reduction of impervious surface
on the site. Forest requirement as proposed are in compliance. Ms.
Moredock noted lighting still needs to be addressed. Signage must
also be addressed. A complete set of elevations are required for
preliminary approval.
Mr. Stoltzfus
said he would like to begin construction early 2004. Mr. Shearon
feels they should be able to obtain a building permit but that no
occupancy permit can be issued until either a well is drilled to
provide water or hookup
to the public system. Wayne Morris of the Department of Water and
Waste Water has informed the developer that allocation will be available
and has requested the County Commissioners to approve the allocation.
Additional discussion ensued regarding the water and sewer capacity.
Ed Birkmire, Director of the Environmental Office at the Kent County
Health Department was asked to comment. He advised the Health Department
is required to review allocation figures. From what he has seen
it appears the figures are low. Mr. Birkmire pointed out, it is
the Health Department who determines the needed allocation for buildings.
Figures are not needed for preliminary plan review but it is a requirement
for final approval.
The Planning
Commission discussed the outstanding issues and questioned if they
could grant preliminary approval. Mr. Stoltzfus told the Board he
wants to move ahead with his project. He feels the allocations will
be available.
Chairman
Morris invited the public to comment. John Kowalski, River Road
resident, submitted seven photos of the Stoltzfus property and his
written comments. Mr. Kowalski is concerned about fire safety and
overgrown evergreens. He is concerned about increased trucks and
tanker parking and hazards trucks can create. Mr. Kowalski feels
the site plan has too many flaws which must be corrected for the
safety of the public and local neighbors. He requested the Board
deny the site plan as proposed.
William
Zier, resident of River Road (behind the Dutch Deli), has concerns
regarding stormwater drainage and how it flows to his property.
Dust and dirt from the Stoltzfus property is also a problem. Current
lighting from Dutch Family Dwelling shines directly into his home
Summarizing
discussion, Chairman Morris advised Mr. Stoltzfus he needs to: address
signage; lighting; allocation of water and sewer; elevations for
rear of buildings; and work with his neighbors regarding their concerns.
After more discussion, Mr. Stoltzfus asked to table his proposal
allowing him time to address the outstanding issues. He plans to
come back before the Planning Commission at the December 4 meeting.
STAFF
REPORTS
Gail
Webb Owings, Planning Director - Mrs. Owings advised the
office has issued numerous permits some of which were because of
Hurricane Isabel. Mrs. Owings reminded the Board of the meeting
at Chesapeake College. Staff is currently working on zoning violations
in Election District Six as instructed by the County Commissioners.
There
being no further business, Chairman Morris adjourned the meeting
at 5:15 p.m.
___________________________________
Elizabeth
H. Morris, Chairman
___________________________________
Elizabeth
Carroll, Secretary
Kent County Department of Planning &
Zoning
County Government Center
400 High Street
Chestertown, MD 21620
Tel: (410) 778-7475
Fax: (410) 810-2932
E-mail:gowings@kentgov.org
© Kent County, Maryland, U.S.A.
Information is for personal use only. Any redistribution of this
information is strictly prohibited without permission from Kent
County, Maryland.
Kent County shall make all efforts
to ensure that the Kent County Planning Commission Home Page and
its links are accurate and up-to-date. However, Kent County shall
not be liable for any errors, inaccuracies, omissions, or untimeliness
of the information contained herein.
|