|
The Kent County Planning Commission met in regular
session on Thursday, June 5, 2003, in the County Commissioners Hearing
Room at 400 High Street, Chestertown, Maryland, with the following
members in attendance: Elizabeth H. Morris, Chairman; William S.
Sutton; Marcy Brown; Rev. Ruben Freeman; Jay Lancaster; G. Mitchell
Mowell, Attorney; Gail Webb Owings, Planning Director; Carla Martin,
Community Planner; Amy Moredock, Environmental Planner; and Elizabeth
Carroll Secretary. Also in attendance were two new members. Chairman
Morris introduced Patricia Langenfelder, who is completing the unexpired
term of Wallace Miller; and F. Joseph Hickman, filling the unexpired
term of Roger Mangels.
APPLICATIONS FOR REVIEW
#03-33 Harry
Dixon - Conditional Use (Gravel Pit Expansion) - Mr. Dixon
is requesting approval to expand his existing 5-acre gravel pit
by approximately 3-acres. The pit is located on a 93.62 acre farm
off Bradford Johnson Road, near Golts. The property is zoned "AZD".
Mr. Dixon was present and sworn in with staff by
Chairman Morris. Mr. Dixon presented papers with findings from Randy
Denny, Maryland Department of the Environment in Annapolis.
Ms. Martin reviewed the staff report noting the history
of the gravel pit. A 2-3 acre gravel pit has existed on this site
since 1954. Mr. Dixon obtained conditional use approval for a 4-acre
gravel pit from the Board of Appeals in October 1990. Conditional
use approval was granted again in November 1991, March 1993, and
October 1998 to expand the gravel pit in accordance with zoning
regulations. In September 2001, the Board of Appeals granted an
extension of that approval to continue operation of the gravel pit.
Portions of the site have been reclaimed after excavation. There
has never been more than 5-acres actively mined at the same time.
Ms. Martin addressed relevant issues referring to
applicable law found in Article VII, Section 3.45 of the Zoning
Ordinance. Staff discussed her findings. Ms. Martin recommended
approval to allow expansion to the east of the existing gravel pit
with the condition that the reclamation plan require the site be
restored to prime agricultural land. However, Ms. Martin recommended
denial of expansion of the pit to the north in order to protect
the stream that is approximately 1000 feet from the existing pit.
Mr. Dixon informed the Planning Commission that he
wants to keep the pit active. The pit is extra income and helps
when farming is not so productive. Mr. Dixon reviewed the site plan
with the Board showing the location of the pit and how he wishes
to expand east and northeast at least 800-feet away from the stream.
Mr. Dixon noted that each time he has requested an expansion it
has been for 2-acres. It was noted that once a portion of the pit
is reclaimed, that portion is no longer considered as part of the
active pit. He further noted 5-acres has been reclaimed and he is
currently working in a 2-acre area. He is now asking for an additional
2-acre. A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the location and expansion
of the pit. Mr. Dixon has been working with Mike Scott Surveying
and Bruce Wright, an engineer, to see what needs to be done with
regards to the sediment control trap. There is a wash on the south
corner which will be corrected shortly. Concerns were expressed
regarding negative impact to the stream and discussion continued
between the Board, staff and the applicant.
Chairman Morris asked for comments from the audience.
There were no public comments.
After additional discussion, Ms. Brown made a motion
to forward a favorable recommendation to the Board of Appeals for
the conditional use request of Harry Dixon to expand his existing
5-acre gravel pit by approximately 3-acres, conditioned upon:
- -The conditional use is not to exceed a period of 3-years;
- -Because approximately one acre is currently prime agricultural
land, and when reclaimed the future use the use of land must
be for prime agriculture, or developed woodland for wildlife
habitat;
- -Because of the proximity of the stream, the gravel pit should
not come any closer than 700 feet from the stream to preserve
water quality; and
- -A current site plan is needed.
The Planning Commission made the following finds
of fact:
- -No material has been brought off the site for processing,
mixing or similar purposes;
- -Excavating or extraction operation has been controlled to
offer reasonable protection to surrounding properties, the neighborhood,
and streets for access to the site;
- -There are no threatened or endangered species;
- -The pit is not in the RCD or CAR area;
- -The pit will not disturb the 100-foot buffer;
- -The pit currently has an approved restoration plan from
the Surface Mining Division of the Department of Water Resources;
- -The owner is working with an engineer to prepare an updated
sediment control plan;
- -There are no non-tidal wetlands on the site; and
- -The location of the excavation or extraction is located
in such a way there is no unsightly, hazardous, or wasteful
condition of the land.
The motion was seconded. The motion carried by a unanimous
vote.
#03-40 Beatrice
M. Harwood - Buffer Variance - Ms. Harwood requests a variance
of 40-feet to allow her to construct a 202 square foot addition
within the 100-foot Critical Area Buffer on her 5.15-acre parcel
located on Walnut Point Road. The property is zoned "RCD".
Beatrice Harwood and her surveyor Bill Crowding were
present and sworn in with staff by Chairman Morris.
Ms. Moredock read her staff report advising the Planning
Commission of relevant issues. Applicable law is found in Article
V, Section 4.1, Article X, Section 2.23, and Article IX, Section
2.3 of the Zoning Ordinance. She further noted the variance will
not cause a substantial detriment to neighboring properties, nor
will it change the character of the district. The Comprehensive
Plan encourages the maintenance of buffers. She feels an addition
to the existing dwelling does not constitute an unwarranted hardship,
nor does it deny the applicant of uses generally shared by neighboring
property owners.
Staff recommended denial of the variance request,
however if the Board is inclined to approve the variance, she recommended
approval be granted contingent on the following:
- Mitigation of 3:1 for disturbance within the buffer should
be required consisting of a mix of native trees and shrubs;
- The old growth tree should be replaced at a ratio of 3:1
based on the square footage of the canopy of the tree; and
- Stormwater runoff from proposed addition should be directed
to stable vegetation in the form of rain gardens.
The office received correspondence from the Critical
Areas Commission stating if a variance is granted it should be contingent
upon mitigation. Ms. Moredock read the letter to the Board.
Chairman Morris invited Ms. Harwood and Mr. Crowding
to comment. Mr. Crowding reviewed the site plan with the Planning
Commission. He pointed out the house was built in 1966, but the
Harwoods purchased the house in 1985. Mrs. Harwood would like to
increase the size of the kitchen by bringing it even with the front
of the house. Trees will be planted in accordance with the regulations.
Mrs. Harwood noted the existing mature tree is very
close to the house. A large limb fell off a few years ago causing
damage to the roof. Although the tree will probably not fall on
the house however additional large limbs could.
Chairman Morris asked for comments from the audience.
There were no public comments.
After reviewing all issues and much discussion, Ms.
Brown made a motion to forward an unfavorable recommendation to
the Board of Appeals recommending denial of Mrs. Hardwood's variance
request to build a 202-square foot addition within the 100-foot
Critical Area Buffer. The Planning Commission could not establish
an unwarranted hardship, however the Board did find:
- -The granting of a variance would not cause a substantial
detriment to adjacent or neighboring properties;
- -A variance would not change the character of the neighborhood
or district;
- -There does not appear to be a practical difficulty;
- -There does not appear to be an unwarranted hardship; and
- -The granting of a variance may adversely affect water quality.
Should the Board of Appeals grant the variance, the
Planning Commission recommends:
- -Mitigation of 3:1 for disturbance within the buffer should
be required consisting of a mix of native trees and shrubs;
- -Old growth tree should be replaced at a ratio of 3:1 based
on the square footage of the canopy of the tree; and
- -Stormwater runoff from proposed addition should be directed
to stable vegetation in the form of rain gardens.
The motion was seconded. The motion carried by a majority
vote.
The Planning Commission took a 10-minute break. Upon
returning, Chairman Morris advised she would be leaving the meeting
early because of another commitment, and Vice-Chairman Bill Sutton
would conduct the balance of the meeting.
#03-44 Hunter's
Run, Section B (21 Lots) - Major Subdivision - The developer,
Donald Reed, is requesting preliminary approval for Section B of
Hunter's Run. Section B consists of 32.709 acres and is zoned "RR".
The property is located off Gregg Neck Road and is surrounded by
farmland, woodland and home sites.
Donald Reed was present and sworn in with staff.
Attorney Saunders, attorney for the applicant was also present.
Ms. Martin reviewed the staff report with regards
to the history of this property. At the July 2002 Planning Commission
meeting, final approval was granted for Phase A of the Hunter's
Run Subdivision.
Ms. Martin referenced the County's Comprehensive Plan
and applicable law found in Article V, Section 3. of the Zoning
Ordinance. All lots meet the minimum requirements. Stormwater management
is currently under review, and a stormwater management bond will
be required prior to final approval. A forest conservation plan
for the entire property was approved under Section A. Staff recommended
preliminary approval of Section B.
Staff advised no correspondence has been received
from adjoining property owners.
Attorney Saunders noted for the new board members
that Mr. Reed has been through this process for Section A. The subdivision
was presented in phases because there were wet weather issues pertaining
to Section B which had to be monitored for an extended period of
time. Health Department is now ready to sign off on Section B.
Mr. Reed confirmed that the Health Department has
officially given preliminary approval. The Planning Office has not
received written confirmation from the Health Department.
Mr. Reed and Attorney Saunders reviewed the plat
with the Planning Commission. Discussion ensued regarding afforestation
as well as Gregg Neck Road. Comments were made about the subdivision's
open space and Mr. Reed advised the homeowners association, through
deed restrictions and covenants, will maintain the open space.
The audience was invited to comment on Section B
of Hunter's Run. Jeffrey Goddess, resident of Wilmington and Gregg
Neck, expressed issues with regards to Gregg Neck Road. He is concerned
about design of some of the lots and hopes there will be sufficient
screening to reduce visibility of the rear of some of these lots
from Gregg Neck Road.
Mr. Goddess has concern aesthetics and the possible
fencing of some lots and numerous satellite dishes and antennas.
He asked about retention areas and who will be responsible for maintenance.
Mr. Goddess asked when is the developer required to install erosion
control measures. Mr. Reed replied, during construction of Section
A. Mr. Reed added, the subdivision will have an architectural review
committee to address various issues.
There being no other public comments, the Planning
Commission discussed at length several issues. Following review
and discussion, Ms. Brown made a motion to grant preliminary subdivision
approval for Section B of Hunter's Run Subdivision, conditioned
upon:
- -The location of the driveway for Lot 24 must be so indicated.
The entrance must not come out on the curve of Gregg Neck Road;
- -The row of trees behind Lots 32, 33, 34, 35, and 36 must
be increased to provide a denser buffer. The trees should be
a variety of species;
- -Gregg Neck Road should be reviewed again to verify it is
a safe road especially at the entrance to the subdivision;
- -Stormwater management basin should be reviewed again to
determine if bio-retention basins could work more efficiently;
- -A bond will be required at final for stormwater management;
and
- -Review covenants to verify if antennas are addressed.
The motion was seconded. The vote unanimous to grant
preliminary approval for Section B of Hunter's Run.
#02-140
Millington Food Lion - Concept Site Plan - Millington Food
Lion is before the Planning Commission for review of their concept
site plan. The applicants wish to build a one-story 28,657 square
foot retail store on approximately 6-acres of a 228 acre farm owned
by Albert Aaron. The property is located on Route 291, west of Millington.
The zoning for this site is "CC" Crossroads Commercial and "RCD"
Resource Conservation District. Public water and sewer will service
the site.
Vincent D. Watkins of the Watkins Group, Cornelius,
North Carolina; Denis Grillo, Portsmouth, Virginia; David Powers,
McCrone, Inc., Centreville; Ken Schmid, Traffic Concepts, Annapolis,
were sworn in with staff by Acting Chairman Sutton.
Mrs. Owings reviewed the staff report addressing
relevant issues and noting applicable law found in both the existing
zoning ordinance as well as the proposed land use ordinance which
will probably be in affect when the applicants submit their preliminary
and final plats for review. Specific issues addressed in the staff
report include: access from Route 291; Parking and on-site vehicular
flow; landscaping; forest conservation; environmental standards;
and stormwater and sediment control.
Mrs. Owings noted the developers voluntarily held
a public informational meeting recently at the Millington Fire House.
Both positive and negative comments were expressed concerning site
location; impact on the water quality of the Chester River; lighting
and glare to adjoining properties; and safety of the entrance.
Mr. Watkins informed the Planning Commission that
a smaller store is proposed for the Millington site but will provide
full service to meet the needs of the community and market area.
Food Lion will be purchasing the land. Mr. Watkins said he has met
with the planning staff and has attempted to comply with their suggestions.
The building has an appearance of four different buildings similar
in looks to downtown Millington.
Mr. Grillo, an architect with Balmer and Associates,
has worked with Food Lion for many years. He noted the purpose of
this design is to give the appearance of a village/main street storefront.
There is some concern about the size of the permitted attached sign.
He hopes the Planning Commission will consider allowing a larger
sign that would be visible from the road.
Mr. Watkins added to staff's comments about the citizen's
participation meeting. He felt the meeting was more positive than
negative. Some of the issues raised by the public have been incorporated
into the site plan, one of concern being the flow of traffic at
entrance. They want to be responsive to the community. They have
completed other Food Lions in small counties and have tried to build
something compatible to the area.
The developers presented the concept plan for review
and discussion. Mr. Powers of McCrone, Inc., reviewed the site plan
pointing out adjoining properties and showing the location of the
store, flow of traffic and parking. He also noted stormwater management
and pointed out the location of stormwater drainage. Forest conservation
and landscaping was noted. A walkway is shown on their property
on Route 291.
Mr. Watkins added that trucks will be parking in
the rear and will not be visible from the road. Refrigerated trucks
will not park on-site overnight. He also feels that development
of this property will reduce agricultural runoff into the river.
They are currently working with State Highway regarding the entrance.
Discussion ensued regarding the entrance at Route 291and parking
areas.
Ken Smith of Traffic Concepts, commented on State
Highway's letter with regards to the entrance. Long-term issues
will be addressed. Mr. Smith is working on a study which should
be made available to State and County agencies in the near future.
Traffic counts are complete.
Summarizing the lengthy discussion, the Planning
Commission expressed the following for consideration:
- -The architecture of the building reflects the character
of the area and is a good example of designing a building that
respects the best assets of the community.
- -The outdoor sales and storage area should be shown on the
site plan.
- -Outside storage area should not impede pedestrian or vehicular
movement on the site.
- -Provide sidewalk and bike path easement to Howard Johnson's
and along Route 291.
- -Investigate the use of bio-retention on the site.
- -Size of the sign will be reviewed.
The developers expressed their appreciation for review
of their concept plan and will take into consideration the issues
raised and will be back before the Planning Commission in the near
future with the preliminary plan for the Millington Food Lion.
#03-46 Andover
Acres / John Stoltzfus - Adjustment of Lot Lines of Major Subdivision
- Mr. Stoltzfus is requesting approval to make minor adjustments
to twenty-six property lines revising lot lines for Lots 1 - 7,
and Lots 13 - 17 of the Andover River Acres Subdivision which received
final subdivision approval at the February 2003 Planning Commission
meeting.
Jack Kirby, McCrone, Inc. was present and sworn in
with staff by Acting Chairman Sutton.
Ms. Martin advised revisions are necessary to correct
a drafting error in the original plat. The error was discovered
when the surveyor started to stake the corners of the lots. Ms.
Martin noted applicable law found in Article V, Section 3.5 of the
Zoning Ordinance. The lots continue to meet or exceed these requirements
and staff recommended approval of the lot line adjustments.
Mr. Kirby explained the drafting error and the revised
plat will clean up the land record. Acreage will remain the same.
The road will remain the same.
There is no correspondence on file and no comments
expressed by the audience.
Motion was made by Ms. Brown to approve the Andover
Acres adjustment of lot lines as presented. The motion was seconded
and the vote unanimous.
STAFF REPORTS
Amy G, Moredock,
Environmental Planner - Ms. Moredock advised the Early Action
Compact was signed by the Kent County Commissioners and will be
sent to EPA and MDE. The EAC is a joint effort by Kent and Queen
Anne's Counties who have been identified ozone non-attachment areas
by EPA.
Carla A.
Martin, Community Planner - Ms. Martin commented on her trip
to Brazil. She reminded the Board of the National Scenic Byways
dedication Friday, June 4, 1 p.m., at the foot of High Street and
invited everyone to attend.
Gail Webb
Owings, Planning Director - Mrs. Owings informed the Planning
Commission of the summer workshops organized by the Maryland Citizen
Planners Association for June 30 in Denton and July 1 in Elkton.
Notices will be sent out as soon as available. Let the office know
if you plan to attend.
Mrs. Owings and Ms. Martin recently attended a "Scenic
Maryland" meeting. One of the topics "Cell Towers" was informative.
KENT COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE - The hearing
has been scheduled for Tuesday, June 24, 2003 at 7:00 p.m., in the
County Commissioners Hearing Room. A copy of the public be forwarded
to Commission members.
GENERAL DISCUSSION - Staff has been contacted
by a member of the Chestertown Planning Commission who would like
to have another joint meeting with the county and incorporated town
planning commission members to discuss bio-retention, creative stormwater
management, and show the video of Ed McMahon's presentation. After
a brief discussion, it was suggested that a joint meeting be scheduled
possibly for the Fall for either an evening meeting or Saturday
morning.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned
at 5:30 p.m.
________________________________________
Elizabeth H. Morris, Chairman
________________________________________
William S. Sutton, Vice-Chairman
________________________________________
Elizabeth Carroll, Secretary
Kent County Department of Planning &
Zoning
County Government Center
400 High Street
Chestertown, MD 21620
Tel: (410) 778-7475
Fax: (410) 810-2932
E-mail:gowings@kentgov.org
© Kent County, Maryland, U.S.A.
Information is for personal use only. Any redistribution of this
information is strictly prohibited without permission from Kent
County, Maryland.
Kent County shall make all efforts
to ensure that the Kent County Planning Commission Home Page and
its links are accurate and up-to-date. However, Kent County shall
not be liable for any errors, inaccuracies, omissions, or untimeliness
of the information contained herein.
|