|
The Kent County Planning Commission met in regular
session on Thursday, July 3, 2003, in the County Commissioners Hearing
Room with the following members in attendance: Elizabeth Morris,
Chairman; Bill Sutton; Jay Lancaster; Rev. Ruben Freeman; Marcy
Brown; Patricia Langenfelder; F. Joseph Hickman; G. Mitchell Mowell,
Attorney; Gail Owings, Planning Director; Carla Martin, Community
Planner; Amy Moredock, Environmental Planner; and Elizabeth Carroll,
Secretary.
MINUTES - The Minutes of the June 5, 2003
meeting were approved as written.
APPLICATIONS FOR REVIEW
#03-25 John
and Nancy Caldwell - Variances (Buffer & Slope >15%)
- The Caldwells propose to build a 3 by 60-foot deck. The deck will
be located on slopes greater than 15-percent and within the expanded
buffer, requiring two variances: a buffer variance and a variance
of slopes greater than 15-percent. The 2.203 acre parcel is located
on Kinnaird's Point Road in the Third Election District and is zoned
"CAR" Critical Area Residential.
John and Nancy Caldwell were present and sworn in
with staff by Chairman Morris.
The Caldwells met with the Planning Commission at
the May 2003 meeting with this same proposal. At that time, the
Caldwells withdrew their variance proposal deciding to construct
a 2-foot deck which only required a building permit since they were
not increasing their impervious surface due to the 2-foot overhang
of the roof.
Ms. Moredock reviewed her staff report and relevant
issues. Applicable law includes Article V, Section 4; Article X,
Section 2.23; and Article IX, Section 2.3 of the Zoning Ordinance
which sets forth the standards for granting a variance. Staff does
not feel a deck constitutes an unwarranted hardship, nor does it
deny the applicant of uses generally shared by neighboring property
owners. The proposal is not consistent with the Ordinance's buffer
and steep slope requirements, and therefore staff recommended denial.
Should the Board approve the two variances, the approval should
be contingent upon the following:
- The area of the proposed deck, which extends beyond the existing
impervious area, should be pervious.
- Mitigation of 3:1 for disturbance within the buffer and 1:1
for disturbance outside the buffer should be requires consisting
of a mix of native trees and shrubs: and
- Stormwater runoff from proposed structures should be direct
to stable vegetation.
There was no correspondence of neighboring property
owners.
Mr. Caldwell explained his dilemma, in that the 2-foot
wide deck does not give him sufficient walking space when windows
are open. The purpose of the 3-foot deck with a railing is to allow
him the ability to clean windows safely which he is currently unable
to do because of the steep slope of the property. Mr. Caldwell submitted
photos of his property and home. He does not feel the additional
deck width will be harmful to the environment.
The Planning Commission discussed at length the Critical
Area regulations and the Critical Areas Commission's letter. After
review, Mr. Sutton made a motion to recommend the Board of Appeals
deny the Caldwell's variance request to place a 3-foot deck within
the expanded buffer and on slopes greater than 15-percent, based
on the following findings:
- -The Planning Commission could not find any unwarranted hardship;
- -The proposal is not consistent with the Zoning Ordinance
and the Critical Area regulations;
- -The variance is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
- -There will be no substantial detriment to neighboring properties,
nor will it change the character of the neighborhood;
- -The applicant would not be denied any use shared by neighboring
properties.
- -The need for the variance is caused by the applicant's own
actions; and
- -The proposal may adversely affect water quality, fish, wildlife
and plant habitat.
Should the Board of Appeals approve the two variances,
the Planning Commission would recommend approval contingent on:
- -The area of the proposed deck, which extends beyond the
existing impervious area, should be pervious.
- -Mitigation of 3:1 for disturbance within the buffer and
1:1 for disturbance outside the buffer should be requires consisting
of a mix of native trees and shrubs: and
- -Stormwater runoff from proposed structures should be direct
to stable vegetation
The motion was seconded. The vote was unanimous.
#03-49 Howard's
Gift Farm LP / Frank Plummer - Major Subdivision - Mr. Plummer
requesting preliminary and final approval for a major subdiviison
of one lot from the 263-acre farm owned by Howard's Gift Limited
Partnership. The new 2.918 acre parcel will be located on Earl Nicholson
Road and Annie Crow Road in the Sixth Election District. The property
is zoned "AZD".
Joe Hickman and Jay Lancaster advised they know Mr.
Plummer personally but do not feel that friendship will hinder their
judgement.
Frank Plumber and Mike Scott were present and sworn
in with staff by Chairman Morris. The owner, Mr. Bigelow was in
the audience.
Ms. Martin reviewed the staff report noting applicable
law found in Article V of the Zoning Ordinance as well as the Comprehensive
Plan, and addressing environmental regulations. Deed restrictions
for forest protection and forest maintenance must be approved by
Attorney Mowell, and a Letter-of-Credit for the afforestation is
required. Ms. Martin recommended the Board grant preliminary and
final subdivision approval.
No correspondence has been received from adjoining
neighbors regarding this proposed subdivision.
Mr. Scott advised this is the sixth lot from the
original parcel making it a major subdivision. Forest is shown on
plat. The proposal meets subdivision requirements.
Mr. Plummer, the contract purchaser, noted he and
his wife plan to build one house on 2.9 acres, in accordance with
county requirements. Mr. Plummer advised the Health Department has
okayed this site for a mound system. All plantings will be comply
with Forest Conservation requirements. Discussion continued.
Chairman Morris asked if the owner plans to further
subdivide the property. Mr. Scott advised the potential is there
for more subdivision, but the owner is just creating one lot at
this time.
Following some discussion, Ms. Brown made a motion
to grant preliminary and final subdivision plat approval for the
creation of one 2.9 acre lot from the lands of Mr. Bigelow, based
on the following being submitted prior to the release of the final
signature plat and issuance of a building permit:
- -Receipt and acceptance Letter-of-Credit for afforestation
by the County Commissioners; and
- -Deed restrictions approved by Attorney Mowell.
The Planning Commission made the following findings:
- -The proposal is meets the criteria of the zoning ordinance
and subdivision regulations for the creation of this parcel,
however the regulations do discourage subdivision of lots that
strip the public road.
The motion was seconded and the vote unanimous.
#03-65 Ronald
H. & Robin B. Fithian - Zoning Map Amendment - Mr. and
Mrs. Fithian are requesting a zoning map amendment to change the
zoning of their 23-acre parcel from "AZD" Agricultural Zoning District
to "CR" Community Residential. The property is located on Anderson
Avenue and Route 445 at the edge of the Rock Hall town limits. This
property is in the existing service area for public sewerage.
Ronald and Robin Fithian were sworn in with staff
by Chairman Morris.
Mrs. Owings reviewed the staff report commenting
on relevant issues. She pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan
encourage growth to occur in and around existing communities in
a way that compliments and enhances their character. This property
is surrounded by small lots served by sewer to the west and south
and existing forest to the north and east.
Applicable law is found in Article XI, Section 6
of the Zoning Ordinance, which establishes the procedures and requirements
for zoning map amendments. A
Guide to Maryland Zoning Decisions describes the "change
or mistake rule."
Mrs. Owings advised that agricultural zoning on this
23-acre parcel is not consistent with the goal of the County's Comprehensive
Plan to direct growth in and around existing communities. It is
not consistent with the zoning of other properties designated in
the Water and Sewer Plan which is served by public water and sewer.
Staff recommended approval since it is felt a mistake
was made in the mapping by not recognizing this property is in the
existing sewerage service area. "CR" Community Residential is the
most appropriate zoning for the area.
No correspondence has been received in the Planning
and Zoning Office with regards to the proposed map change. There
were no comments from the audience.
Chairman Morris invited the applicants to comment.
Mr. Fithian advised he has owned the 23-acre wooded parcel since
1987. He feels the property should be zoning "CR" rather than "AZD"
because of the availability of public water and sewer. He feels
there was a mapping error and concurs with staff. Mr. Fithian reviewed
the tax map pointing out the location of his property and the surrounding
properties.
After reviewing the State's criteria for rezoning
and a lengthy discussion, Ms. Brown made a motion to forward a favorable
recommendation to the County Commissioners recommending approval
of the Mr. and Mrs. Fithian's request to rezone their 23-acre parcel
from "AZD" to "CR". This decision is based on the following findings:
- -A mapping error occurred in the original zoning;
- -The property is within the designated Water and Sewer Plan
and service area;
- -The property is just outside the Town of Rock Hall;
- -The County Comprehensive Plan states growth should occur
in and around existing communities;
- -The "CR" zoning meets a public need allowing for housing
on public sewer and utilizing infrastructure.
The motion was seconded and the vote unanimous.
STAFF REPORTS
Amy G. Moredock,
Environmental Planner - Ms. Moredock advised the County is
committed to join the Early Action Compact with Starting out-reach
to businesses.
The Army Corps of Engineers will be giving a presentation
on the status of the Urieville Lake restoration project to the County
Commissioners the end of July. She will advise the Planning Commission
member of the date when confirmed.
Carla A.
Martin, Community Planner - The National Scenic Byway dedication
at the foot of High Street, held in June, went very well.
Gail Webb
Owings, Planning Director - Mrs. Owings advised the Board
of Appeals approved Beatrice Harwood's variance request because
of a mold problem and deterioration of the home, and not taking
the large tree down would damage the foundation of the house.
In accordance with Article 66-B and at the County
Commissioners request, it is time to start the review process of
the County's Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission discussed
with staff options for the review process, and made the following
suggestions:
- -To work on the plan without hiring a consultant, but be
able to call upon professional for their expertise when needed;
- -Additional planning staff will be needed;
- -Start process with a visioning exercise involving the public.
Staff will forward the Board's comments on to the
County Commissioners.
GENERAL DISCUSSION
Mr. Lancaster expressed concern about the location
of the entrance for Hunter's Run Subdivision, Phase B, and asked
staff to request the County Roads Department Supervisor inspect
Gregg Neck Road and the proposed entrance for the subdivision. Mr.
Lancaster feels the tax map and plat do not show the "S" curve in
Gregg Neck Road. Contrary to the County Engineer's comments, Mr.
Lancaster feels the subdivision road does not provide adequate visibility
and creates a dangerous situation. Mrs. Owings advised she would
contact Ed Spray, County Roads Supervisor and ask him to physically
inspect the site.
Planning Commission discussed other zoning issues
with staff.
There being no further business, Chairman Morris
adjourned the meeting at 3:15 p.m.
____________________________________
Elizabeth H. Morris, Chairman
____________________________________
Elizabeth E. Carroll, Secretary
Kent County Department of Planning &
Zoning
County Government Center
400 High Street
Chestertown, MD 21620
Tel: (410) 778-7475
Fax: (410) 810-2932
E-mail:gowings@kentgov.org
© Kent County, Maryland, U.S.A.
Information is for personal use only. Any redistribution of this
information is strictly prohibited without permission from Kent
County, Maryland.
Kent County shall make all efforts
to ensure that the Kent County Planning Commission Home Page and
its links are accurate and up-to-date. However, Kent County shall
not be liable for any errors, inaccuracies, omissions, or untimeliness
of the information contained herein.
|