KENT COUNTY, MARYLAND
PLANNING AND ZONING

The Kent County Planning Commission met in regular session on Thursday, March 1, 2007, at 1:30 p.m., in the County Commissioners’ Hearing Room at 400 High Street, Chestertown, with the following members in attendance: Elizabeth Morris, Chairman; Patricia Langenfelder; Marcy Brown; Rev. Ruben Freeman; Jay Lancaster; Joseph Hickman; G. Mitchell Mowell, Attorney; Gail W. Owings, Planning Director; Carla Martin, Community Planner; Amy Moredock, Environmental Planner; and Kim Dixon, Secretary

Chairman Elizabeth Morris called the meeting to order. 

MINUTES

The minutes of the February 1, 2007 meeting were approved with changes to the David A. Bramble application. 

APPLICATIONS FOR REVIEW

McGuire Brothers, Inc. / Timothy McGuire – Ag Preservation District

The McGuire family wishes to create an Agricultural Land Preservation District on their 62.61 acre farm located on Lambs Meadow Road northwest of Kennedyville in the 2^nd Election District.  The farm consists of 50 acres of crop land and 10 acres of woodland.  Approximately 87.6% of the soils are considered Class I or 11 and 12.4% are considered Woodland Group 2.  There are no dwellings on the property.  The farm is zoned “AZD”, Agricultural Zoning District and is outside the 10-year water and sewer plan.

Mr. McGuire was present and sworn in with staff by Chairman Morris.

The Agricultural Preservation Advisory Board reviewed this application, found this farm to meet all the criteria for establishing a district, and voted to recommend approval.

Ms. Martin reviewed the staff report noting applicable law found in Code of Public Laws of Kent County which establishes the Agricultural Land Preservation program and sets forth the criteria for reviewing proposed districts. Ms. Martin noted this property meets the criteria for creating an Agricultural Land Preservation District and complies with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, and staff recommended approval.

Chairman Morris invited the applicants to comment.  Mr. McGuire stated that he liked the concept of preserving farmland.

There were no comments from the audience and no correspondence opposing the district.

After a brief discussion, the Board made a motion to forward a favorable recommendation to the County Commissioners, recommending approval of Mr. McGuire’s request to create an Agricultural Preservation District for his 62.61 acre farm on Lambs Meadow Road. The Board’s decision is based on the following findings:

• The farm consists of 50 acres of cropland and 10 acres of woodland.
• Approximately 87.6% of the soils are considered Class I or II and 12.4% are considered Woodland Group 2.
• The property is outside the Ten-Year Water and Sewer Plan.
• The property meets the soils and tillable acreage criteria.
• The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria for the creation of a district.
• The Agricultural Preservation Advisory Board recommended approval.
• This farm is part of a block of over 1,550 acres of districts and easements.

The motion was seconded and the vote unanimous.

Crow Family Trust / Roy W. Crow – Ag Preservation District

The Crow Family Trust wishes to create an Agricultural Land Preservation District on their 233.25-acre farm located on Vansant Corner Road west of Galena in the 2^nd Election District.  The farm consists of 199 acres of crop land and 8 acres of woodland.  Approximately 92.1% of their soils are considered Class I, II and III and 3.6% are considered Woodland Group 2.  There is one dwelling on the property.  The farm is zoned “AZD” Agriculture Zoning District and is outside the 10-year water and sewer plan.  

Mr. Crow was not present, but the Planning Commission decided to review his application.

The Agricultural Preservation Advisory Board reviewed this application, found this farm to meet all the criteria for establishing a district, and voted to recommend approval.

Ms. Martin reviewed the staff report noting applicable law found in Code of Public Laws of Kent County which establishes the Agricultural Land Preservation program and sets forth the criteria for reviewing proposed districts.  Ms. Martin noted this property meets the criteria for creating an Agricultural Land Preservation District and complies with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, and staff recommended approval.

There were no comments from the audience and no correspondence opposing the district.

After a brief discussion, the Board made a motion to forward a favorable recommendation to the County Commissioners, recommending approval of Mr. Crow’s request to create an Agricultural Preservation District for his 233.25 acre farm on Vansants Corner Road.  The Board’s decision is based on the following findings:

• The farm consists of 199 acres of cropland and 8 acres of woodland.
• Approximately 92.1% of the soils are considered Class I, II or III and 3.6% are considered Woodland Group 2.
• The property is outside the Ten-Year Water and Sewer Plan.
• The property meets the soils and tillable acreage criteria.
• The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria for the creation of a district.
• This farm is part of a block of over 5,000 acres of districts and easements.
• The Agricultural Preservation Advisory Board recommended approval.

The motion was seconded and the vote unanimous.

#07-06 David A. Bramble, Inc. Final Site Plan Review (Office Addition)

David A. Bramble, Inc. requests final site plan approval to construct two 30’ x 40’ office wings onto the front of the current building 35 feet from the front property line. Industrial and business properties surround this site on the southern side of Route 291 and a farm is across the road.  The property is zoned “I” Industrial.

Peter Bourne appeared to testify on behalf of David A. Bramble, Inc., 227 North Kent Street Chestertown and was sworn in with staff by Chairman Morris.

Ms. Moredock reviewed the staff report giving the history and noting relevant issues and applicable law found in Article V, Section 15 of the Land Use Ordinance which sets forth criteria for development in the Industrial Zone.  Staff and the Technical Advisory Committee feel the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets requirements.  Staff recommended approval.

There was no correspondence.

Mr. Bourne presented a color rendition of the proposed planting on the site.  He said the goal of the landscaping is to create a sense of entry, to screen unwanted views and reestablish a natural edge.  Plantings at the front of the building will address the scale of vehicles and pedestrians and create a fore court for the main entrance.  Plants were selected for their seasonal interest and are more ornamental in character.  The gaps in the existing hedgerow along the western property boundary near Atlantic Tractor will be closed.  The proposed native plants are tolerant of wet conditions because of a ditch that drains the field and will connect the hedge to create a landscape buffer that screens views and encourages wildlife corridors.  Trees and shrubs will be planted at the northeast property line obscuring views from the road to existing utility boxes.  Tall evergreens will be planted in a double row to create a wall to block views of the service area in the construction yard.  He informed the Board that Mr. Bramble had decided not to move the fence or the gate at this time.  Mr. Bramble feels that for security and safety issues the fence needs to remain where it is.  It may be moved in the future. 

Chairman Morris asked Ms. Moredock if all the plans and everything that is needed for this project had been submitted.  Ms. Moredock said yes, they had.

Ms. Brown asked how big the plants are that would be planted.  Mr. Bourne said they would be six to eight feet tall.  They will contact local contractors to have this work completed when all permits have been obtained. 

Mrs. Morris asked for comments from the audience.  There were none.

After some discussion, Mrs. Langenfelder said that she feels they have done a good job and addressed everything that was requested of them.  She made a motion to approve the final site plan application to construct two 30 x 40 feet office wings onto the front of their building which will be thirty five feet from the front property line.  The Board’s decision is based on the following findings:

<        They complied with the suggestions made by the Planning Commission at preliminary approval

<        The requirements for Stormwater Management have been met

<       The application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and the applicable rules and regulations from the County and State agencies. 

<        There are provisions for off street loading and unloading of vehicles. 

<       The addition places reasonable demands on public structures and infrastructure. 

<        There are adequate methods for sewage and refuge disposable

<        There is adequate protection of abutting properties and County amenities. 

<       They have minimized the area for which existing vegetation is to be removed. 

<        The building setback area is harmonizing with surrounding natural townscape and landscape. 

<       The applicant has addressed the Board’s concerns about the appearance of the fence along Route 291 and has made an effort to soften the view of the equipment storage area making it a more attractive gateway into the Town of Chestertown.   

The motion was seconded, and the vote was unanimous.

#06-153 Miller’s Marine Service, Inc. / Richard Miller – Site Plan Review

Due to confusion in scheduling the applicant was unable to attend the meeting and this application will be heard at the April meeting.

#07-05 Michael and Danielle Hanscom – Special Exception

Michael and Danielle Hanscom, owners of the Brampton Inn, request a special exception to expand their existing Country Inn to a retreat.  They propose to build 2 luxury guest cottages in a walled enclosure which will attach to an existing carriage shed/tack room.  The existing Brampton Inn consists of 10 guest rooms, the innkeeper’s house, garage and laundry facility, and assorted accessory structures.  The 20-acre property is located on Chestertown Road in the 7^th Election District.  The property is zoned “RC” Rural Character.  The surrounding area is characterized by residential development (Fannell’s Meadow and Orchard Hill subdivisions) and agriculture and is zoned “RC”, “CR” Community Residential and “AZD” Agricultural Zoning District.

Michael Hanscom,was present and sworn in with staff by Chairman Morris.

Ms. Moredock reviewed the staff report giving the history and noting relevant issues and applicable law found in Article V, Section 3.3.24 and Article VII, Section 7.49 of the Land Use Ordinance which sets forth criteria for development in the Rural Character Zone.  Staff and the Technical Advisory Committee feel the use of the site is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Ordinance. Staff recommends approval.

There was no correspondence.

Mr. Hanscom said they have been the Brampton Inn since 1987.  It took about 18 years to fully restore the Brampton Inn to its original appearance.  They were in business the entire time it took to restore the building.  They have 10 guest rooms and operate under a Country Inn license.  They are using all of the buildings that were on the site prior to 1989.  There are no remaining buildings, even with extreme renovations, that could be renovated into additional guests rooms.  Therefore they are limited as a Country Inn, and they can not expand anymore.  This is the reason they are applying for a retreat special exception.  As a retreat they can build new structures assuming they are compatible with the character of the existing buildings.  The current average daily room rate is around $240.00, which makes them one of the most expensive lodging facilities in the area.  They have about 8 employees.  Business has been good the last few years and this is why they would like to expand their operation.

The bed and breakfast business is moving more towards privacy oriented, upper scale lodging units.  Of the ten guest rooms, eight have wood burning fireplaces; the other two have gas fireplaces and a lot of them have whirlpools.  The one remaining period structure on the property will be incorporated into the expansion.  It is an 1860’s carriage shed, tack room and probably slave quarters above the tack room which will be renovated and enclosed by the walled structure.  This structure will be built on a corner of the property where no neighbors will be able to see it.  However, there will be extensive screening planted. 

Chairman Morris asked for questions from the Board.  Mrs. Morris asked Mr. Hanscom to point out the structure on the plan.  Mr. Hanscom pointed out the structure and showed where everything would be located.  He said the goal is to make the rooms totally private. 

Ms. Brown asked how far this structure would be from the main building.  Mr. Hanscom replied it would be about 100 yards.  She asked where the guests would eat breakfast.  Mr. Hansom said that they would receive room service delivered to them.  However they have a dinning room that will accommodate them if they would like that.  It would be completely up to the guest.

Mrs. Morris asked how many rooms are in the main house.  Mr. Hanscom said seven. He pointed out the other buildings on the property and their use. 

Mrs. Morris asked Mrs. Owings when you go from a Country Inn to a Retreat what do you pick up.  Mrs. Owings replied that you pick up the ability to have a building which wasn’t in existence prior to 1989 and the potential for additional rooms.  Mrs. Morris asked if the Country Inn applies to public eating spaces or does a retreat.  Mrs. Owings said that it was guests only.

Ms. Brown asked what the definition of a retreat is.  Mrs. Owings stated the definition is “A small meeting facility in a private, natural area, free from distractions thus allowing meeting participants to focus on the goals and objectives of the meeting.”  Ms. Brown asked how this application fits this definition.  They have two meeting rooms but it is not their primary business.  They are a lodging facility.  Ms. Brown asked if it met the standards but not definition. 

Chairman Morris asked for audience comments.  There were none.

After a brief discussion Mr. Mowell said that he feels that there is a need to amend the ordinance and not try to fit a square peg in a round hole.  Mr. Hanscom does not meet the definition to do what he wants therefore the issue should be corrected and not patched.  Ms. Brown asked what that does for this applicant.  Mr. Mowell said his suggestion is to table this and amend the Ordinance to include a Country Inn II or something like that where they can have an increased number of rooms or allow expansion with new construction.

After further discussion, Ms. Brown made a motion for a favorable recommendation to the Board of Appeals for Michael and Danielle Hanscom’s expansion of an existing Country Inn into a Retreat.  The Board based its decision on the following findings:

<        This project meets the standards for a retreat,

<        The size of the site is appropriate,

<        The site can handle the traffic,

<        The nature of the surrounding areas are such that this expansion will not be adverse,

<        The proximity of dwellings, houses of worship and other buildings of public gathering are within the Town of Chestertown which is one and a half miles from the structure,

<        The development of this project will not have an impact on community facilities and services,

<        The applicant is preserving historic landmarks and trees,

<        The application meets the purpose and intent of the Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and meets the intent to have a three tier structure of lodging with country inns, retreats and the largest being a conference center/resort,

<        It is an appropriate use of land,

<        It will conserve property values,

<        The application will not have an impact on fish habitat or wildlife and plants. 

<        The Board feels the definition for retreat should be amended although they do find the fact that the Brampton does have meeting rooms however they feel the definition of the retreat is limiting in the way it is defined. 

            The motion was seconded and unanimously carried.

#06-119 Walter Corson – Buffer Variance

Mr. Corson requests a variance to construct a replacement septic system within the Critical Area Buffer.  The septic tank, septic reserve area, and the drainage field are to be located within the buffer.  The .71 acre property is located on Voegler Drive / Kitchell Terrace in the Sixth Election District and is zoned “CAR” Critical Area Residential.  The existing dwelling was built around 1900 and is located outside the Critical Area Buffer.  A vegetated buffer and steep slopes are present on the parcel.   The Critical Area Buffer is expanded due to the presence of slopes in excess of 15 percent.  The parcel is located along Fairlee Creek; the surrounding area is zoned RCD and CAR with a mixture of farmland and homes on small parcels.

Walter Corson and Jeremy Berg, his architect, were present and sworn in with staff by Chariman Morris.

Ms. Moredock reviewed the staff report giving a description of the proposal and relevant issues including the yard requirements and buffer requirements.  The applicable law is found in Article V, Section 2.5, Section 2.7.B3a and Article IX Section 2.2 of the Land Use Ordinance.  Staff recommends approval contingent upon the replacement system being a nitrogen removal system.  Staff further recommends mitigation of 3:1 for disturbance within the Buffer and if tree removal is necessary, then tree replacement should occur at a ratio of 3:1 square feet of native vegetation within the buffer.  Staff would also like to note that any proposed expansion of the footprint of the existing dwelling onsite may require a buffer variance; further, construction of a proposed replacement dwelling may also require either a buffer variance or a setback variance as there is a small area onsite outside of the Critical Area Buffer and outside of the side and rear building setback restrictions. 

There was no correspondence.

Mr. Corson stated that his request is necessary because the old septic tank is failing and will make the property unusable.  It is a 55 year old steel tank that he put a new lid on.  It has now rotted out and it is time to replace it.

Ms. Brown asked if there is or is not a proposal to expand the footprint.  Ms. Moredock said there is not a proposal at this time; it just needs to be clear that his footprint is in the buffer, and he can go up but not out without a variance.  Mr. Corson said they would like to put a second floor on the structure to double the square footage and this application for the septic tank is the first step to the expansion. 

Mrs. Morris asked if the Health Department had been to the site and advised where the septic system should be.  Mr. Corson said he has worked with Nony Howell.  He showed the board where the system would be placed on the property.  Mrs. Morris asked if the Health Department is aware of the intent to expand the size of the house.  Mr. Corson said they are.  Ms. Brown asked about the deck hanging over the water.  Mr. Corson said it is a one room structure that was built in the 1960’s and it hangs over the water.  Mrs. Morris asked if Mr. Corson had investigated a nitrogen removing system.  Mr. Corson said he is sure that he had to do that type of system.

There were no comments from the audience. 

After some discussion Ms. Brown made a motion to send a favorable recommendation to the Board of Appeals for Mr. Corson’s request for a variance to construct a replacement septic system within the critical area buffer with the followings conditions

<        That the replacement septic system be a nitrogen removing system

<        Mitigation of 3:1 for disturbance within the Buffer and if tree removal is necessary, then tree replacement should occur at a ratio of 3:1 square feet of native vegetation within the buffer

The Planning Commission based their decision on the following findings:

<        The granting of the variance will not cause a substantial detriment to the property nor will it change the character of the district.

<        The Comprehensive Plan encourages the maintenance and upgrading of septic systems with the use of the nitrogen removing systems. 

<        The practicable difficulty was not caused by the applicants own actions and exists as a nature of the property. 

<        The Kent County Health Department has advised that the existing septic system is failing and has advised the applicant as to the location of the system. 

<        The applicant has been told that any expansion to the footprint of the existing dwelling on site would require a buffer variance unless the dwelling was to go up and not out.   

The motion was seconded, and the vote was unanimous.

The Board took a ten minute break.

#05-130 Nelson Clayton / Judith Hogan / Needham Mushroom Farm – Preliminary Plan

Arthur Needham is requesting preliminary site plan approval for a mushroom farm production facility on a 314.08 acre farm located at 12206 Galena Road in the First Election District near Massey.  The farm is currently owned by Nelson Clayton and Judith Hogan and is zoned “AZD” Agricultural Zoning District and “I” Industrial.  The proposal consists of a substrate preparation area in the Industrial District and growing rooms in the Agricultural Zoning District.  The substrate preparation area exceeds the size limits for an agricultural processing operation and is being considered an industrial operation that must comply with the standards found in the Industrial District.  Although the growing rooms are a permitted use, the entire operation is being considered as a single facility for the purposes of site plan review. 

Arthur Needham, and Jack Arrell, Needham Mushroom Farms, Stephen Layden, McCrone, Inc, and Joseph Poppiti, were present and sworn in with staff by Chariman Morris.

Ms. Martin reviewed the staff report giving a description of the proposal and relevant issues including Area, Height, Width and Yard Requirements, as well as Performance Standards, Environmental Standards, Stormwater and Sediment Control and Design Standards.  Applicable law includes Article V, Section 1.5 and 15.5; Article V, Section 15.6; Article V, Section 15.8; Article V, Section 15.8.B.7; Article VI, Section 10 and Article V, Section 15.9.  Staff recommends granting preliminary approval.

Correspondence was received from the Economic Development Office.  The letter was read into the record.  They strongly recommend approval of the Needham request.

Mr. Layden from McCrone gave an overview of the geographic orientation and location.  He went on to further discuss the physical features, natural features, growing operation and substrate operations.  Mr. Layden reviewed the stormwater, septic, water, grading, streams and non-tidal wetland impacts, landscaping and forest conservation, traffic and a phased final plan.  Mr. Layden explained the traffic study that has been done regarding traffic in Galena and around the immediate site.

Mr. Arrell introduced himself as the General Manager of the current Needham Mushroom Farm.  He stated that this is a unique farming operation that operates from approximately 6:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.  He said mushroom growing is dependent upon air and temperature control.   All of the operations are supervised and documented.  The number of employees is critical to their operation.  This farm would operate all year long, everyday.  He said the substrate is not just plain old compost.  All the products they use are agriculture byproducts and are all recycled. Temperature, airflow and oxygen are very important to the growing of mushrooms.  Mr. Arrell addressed the issues of odor, noise, glare from lighting and the landscaping proposals.  He explained that mushrooms can double in size every twenty four hours and therefore must be monitored very closely.  They will comply with all food safety regulations. 

Mr. Poppiti stated that mushrooms will not grow without substrate.  He explained that substrate material coming out is pasteurized.  They expect approximately 600 cubic yards of spent substrate per week, which is about 10 tractor trailer loads.  This material will go to crop farmers, nurseries, landscapers and will be free to home gardeners.  They have more of a demand for the spent substrate than they can supply. It is a stabilized nitrogen source.  They currently have a fertilizer label for this product (a brochure was handed out).  Mrs. Owings asked what the salt content is.  Mr. Poppiti stated that it is approximately 10 to 13 milliliters. 

Ken Lomax of the University of Delaware was present and duly sworn in by Chairman Morris.

Mr. Lomax showed a power point presentation.  This presentation gave an overview of an existing mushroom growing farm that provided information on the odor management technology, noise limiting methods, reducing glare from lighting and a landscape plan. 

Mrs. Morris asked how many employees were expected to be hired.  Mr. Arrell said at this point he could not give that information.  Mrs. Morris asked if harvesting would be done at night.  Mr. Arrell said no they do not harvest at night however employees do check the temperature and moisture of the growing rooms at night.  Mrs. Morris asked if they would be hiring local people.  Mr. Arrell said yes they would hire local people. 

Ms. Brown said she feels the landscaping that backs to the adjoining properties should be a minimum of fifteen feet wide.

Mr. Hickman asked what the height of the building would be.  Mr. Arrell said that the plans with all dimensions would be submitted. 

Ms. Brown asked if more landscaping shouldn’t be done along the road.  Mr. Needham said that he does not have a problem adding more landscaping, however, asked that he be allowed to do this in stages due to the cost.  Mr. Hickman said that as long as the buildings look like agricultural building there shouldn’t be a problem. 

Ms. Brown asked if the parking for the retail outlet could be moved to the side of the building.  She feels this would be more appealing visually.  Mr. Layden said the parking could be moved however he feels it make more sense to leave it in the front of the building. 

Mrs. Morris asked for comments from the audience.

Mr. Roy Hoagland was present and duly sworn in by Chairman Morris

Mr. Hoagland asked if substrate is primarily used by the Needham operation.  Mr. Needham said no they use one third of it and two thirds of it is used by others.  Mr. Hoagland asked if they would operate seven day per week.  Mr. Needham said they would.  Mr. Hoagland then asked how many trucks per week will be bringing raw material into the site.  Mr. Layden said he does not have those numbers now.  The truck traffic will be spread out throughout the day. 

Mr. Hoagland said he is more worried about the noise.  The neighbors are concerned about truck traffic on the road everyday and throughout the night.  He asked if the trucks would operate throughout the night.  Mr. Needham said they currently do take deliveries at night because it accommodates the trucking industry.  Mr. Hoagland said he is most concerned that the traffic will slow after 5:00 p.m.  Mr. Needham said that most of the trucks will go directly to Route 301 and not go through the town of Massey.

Chairman Morris if there were further comments from the audience.  There were none. 

Mr. Needham said he would like to say thank you to the staff as they have been very helpful to him.

Chairman Morris asked for discussion from the Board.  Mr. Lancaster said he feels Mr. Needham has really tried to meet all of the requirements that are being asked of him.  Mr. Hickman stated the town of Massey deserves more landscaping and buffers.  The property should look as good as it can.  Mrs. Langenfelder said the landscaping up against the adjoining neighbors is most important. 

Mrs. Morris asked for any further comments.  There were none.

Ms. Brown made a motion to grant preliminary site plan approval to the Needham project located on a 314 acre farm outside of Massey.  The Board based its decision on the following findings:

<        This project complies with the Comprehensive Plan and promotes agriculture as a viable industry and helps to secure its future in the County. 

<        It meets all the minimum bulk requirements of the Kent County Land Use Ordinance, 

<        The applicant understands that there needs to be a stream crossing permit issued before final approval.

<        The stormwater management plan needs to be approved and letters of credit submitted before final approval.

<        The entrance needs to be widened and paved. 

<        The outdoor storage areas will be clearly designated at final site plan review. 

<        There will be a finalized landscaping plan with the condition the landscaping behind the residences in Massey will be widened. 

<        The Board understands there may be a phase 1 and phase 2 of landscaping to meet with the phase 1 and phase 2 aspects of the project. 

<        Most of the truck traffic will be coming out of the driveway turning left and heading towards Route 301and that any trucks running through Massey will be minimal however there may be some. 

<        A traffic analysis has been completed and there will be no change in the level of service. 

<        One concern is the noise of the trucks but as most trucks will be heading away from Massey that will help with the noise. 

<        All lighting needs to be dark sky compatible. 

<        Employee housing has not been dealt with in the plan other than there will be two 24’ x 60’ accessory farm dwellings and two houses in the Industrial District. 

<        Building elevations must be submitted before final review. 

<        A certified engineers report describing the operation, all machines, products and byproducts will be required before final approval.

The motion was seconded, and the vote was unanimous.

STAFF REPORTS

            Gail Owings, Planning Director reminded the Board that the Housing Summit is scheduled for March 10, 2007 at Washington College from 9:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m.  Hopefully the Board can attend and participate.  There will be three breakout sessions and we are asking everyone to sign up for two of them.  Mrs. Morris asked if Mrs. Owings needed the Board to do anything.  She said they may need one more recorders. 

            The next meeting was scheduled for April 5, 2007 at 1:30 p.m. in the County Commissioners Hearing Room, 400 High Street, Chestertown, MD.

There being no further business, Chairman Morris adjourned the meeting.

_____________________________________

Elizabeth H. Morris, Chairman

________________________________

Kimberly B. Dixon, Secretary